Important Judgments of 2022: Legal Bites Year Update’ and the cases are basically related to the arbitration agreements,fundamental rights, limitations………….. best lawyers in hitesh city ..(top 5 best criminal civil lawyers in madhapur hyderabad )
The High Court has issued a directive to the trial courts in West Bengal stipulating that a sentence of life imprisonment till death, without any scope of remission, can only be passed in any case of rape.(best criminal lawyers in jubilee hills )
Courts in India do not accept death sentences. The sentence of life imprisonment has to be passed by the High Court which can extend this sentence from ten years to life as per law.(top best criminal civil lawyers in jubilee hills hyderabad )
Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Read more at Legal Bites best lawyers in manikonda
There is a law in India which provides for the determination of interest if parties are subject to an agreement between themselves on the same. In Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt Ltd v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation, the issue was whether an arbitrator may award interest under Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 i.e. Power of the arbitral tribunal to award interest if parties are subject to an agreement on the same. The Supreme Court held that by virtue of Section 32 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 it is not open for the arbitral tribunal to “alter or add” anything to their own order issued under Section 31(7).(best lawyers in manikonda)
jacob pulivel v union of india
The Petitioner filed an Interlocutory Application seeking a direction to restrain all authorities and institutions, public and private, from mandating the vaccine in any manner whatsoever, on a precondition of accessing any service or on pain of any penalty. The Petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to various restrictions that were placed by State Governments, other employers and educational institutions on unvaccinated individuals. The Petitioner contended that mandating vaccination for access to resources, public places and means of earning livelihood would be in violation of their fundamental rights, especially so, when scientific studies have shown that unvaccinated persons do not pose more danger of transmission of the virus when compared to vaccinated persons.(best criminal lawyers in hitechcity)
source :- https://www.legalbites.in